Not sure how to grok that statement... do you mean, basically, retagging HEAD as 2.0.34?
Ryan Bloom wrote: > > Agreed, 2.0.34 would need to become HEAD to make this happen. > > Ryan > > ---------------------------------------------- > Ryan Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED] > 645 Howard St. [EMAIL PROTECTED] > San Francisco, CA > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Brian Pane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 9:42 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: I WANT A GA release > > > > Ryan Bloom wrote: > > > > >I think 2.0.34 is good enough for a GA release. There are two major > > >bugs that must be fixed. > > > > > >1) error pages have wrong content-type. Wrowe is working on a fix. > > > > > >2) autoindex problems. I have fixed the showstopper on my system > with > > >a one-line patch. I just need to fix the HEADER/README ordering > > >problem. Expect a commit within the hour to fix autoindex > completely. > > > > > >What else would we need to do to get a GA out of 2.0.34??????? > > > > > > > We'd need to add 0.0.1 to it, at the very least. :-) > > It wasn't until 2.0.35 that the bucket free lists > > were added. Without that code, multiprocessor > > scalability isn't good enough to qualify as anything > > other than a beta release, IMO. > > > > --Brian > > > > > > -- =========================================================================== Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ "A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order will lose both and deserve neither" - T.Jefferson
