> From: Jim Jagielski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 23 April 2002 19:57
> Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > > > > The reason I suggested a hold to Sander on account of the atomics > > is that we have a bunch of PRs relating to building atomics on > > Solaris that haven't been (yet) resolved. > > > > Hold on a tic... I think I see it... On the systems that fail, > I bet they are using GNUas. If so, then ASCPP is 'gcc -E' and thus > the modification of apr_atomic_sparc.s to apr_atomic_sparc.S fails. > If not using GNUas, apr_atomic_sparc.S simply *is* apr_atomic_sparc.s. > So, the problem is what is it in apr_atomic_sparc.s that makes GNUas > barf. If your commit solved the prob, the worker restart issue is the remaining holdup for 2.0.36. I'll tag by the end of the day. Sander
