[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 
> I will call it... "The Covalent Factor".
> 
> If you look at what has REALLY happened in the past
> 3 years ( yes... going back that far since it's now 4 or
> 5 years since 2.0 became a real blib on the radar ) there's
> no question that there was this intense period of 
> development and 'new' things were happening at
> a fast rate. As more and more developers got interested
> in getting 2.0 cranked out the (limited) resources all
> got eaten up in the 2.0 development cycle and 1.3
> development virtually shut down. It was even 'officially'
> shut down long before 2.0 was ready ( 1.3 officially went
> into maintenance mode only ).
> 

By the by...

Covalent signs my paycheck.

And if you look at 1.3, you'll see that I've been pretty
key on staying on top of it.

Kind of blows away your theory, don't it?
-- 
===========================================================================
   Jim Jagielski   [|]   [EMAIL PROTECTED]   [|]   http://www.jaguNET.com/
      "A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order
             will lose both and deserve neither" - T.Jefferson

Reply via email to