On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 09:15:26PM +0100, Sander Striker wrote: > On Mon, 2004-03-15 at 20:39, Ben Collins-Sussman wrote: > > On Mon, 2004-03-15 at 12:02, Joshua Slive wrote: > > > > > Disadvantages of moving to subversion: > > > - Not as portable (?) > > > > (Subversion clients/servers run anywhere APR does. I think that's > > actually more portable than CVS, since I don't believe CVS pserver runs > > on win32 at all.) > > neon has been the most limiting dependency for a client, I am told.
Mmm, such juicy tempting FUD. Your anonymous informant should report portability bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED], rather than spreading gossip, since I see only a few issues. Amusingly, last time someone touted the "neon should use APR" flag, it was for the getaddrinfo issue on HP-UX which it turns out APR doesn't actually have a fix for still. APR, n.: not a portability panacea
