On Tue, 2004-03-16 at 22:03, Joe Orton wrote: > On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 09:15:26PM +0100, Sander Striker wrote: > > neon has been the most limiting dependency for a client, I am told. > > Mmm, such juicy tempting FUD. Your anonymous informant should report > portability bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED], rather than spreading gossip, since > I see only a few issues. Amusingly, last time someone touted the "neon > should use APR" flag, it was for the getaddrinfo issue on HP-UX which it > turns out APR doesn't actually have a fix for still.
Sorry Joe, I'm sure the anonymous reporter is happy to respond (I'm BCC'ing him) ;) Sander
