On Thu, 4 Nov 2004, Joe Orton wrote: > This factors out the logic for correctly inserting a file into a > brigade, doing the special little dance for large files if necessary; > the code was already duplicated twice and it's needed in other places > too. (pervasive largefile support being my top 2.1 goal :)
Amen, brother. Thank you! :) > Any comments, naming preferences, "put it in apr-util you twit" flames? I'd have absolutely no objection to that. Sounds like a fabulous idea actually. --Cliff
