* Joe Orton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
> This factors out the logic for correctly inserting a file into a
> brigade, doing the special little dance for large files if necessary;
> the code was already duplicated twice and it's needed in other places
> too.  (pervasive largefile support being my top 2.1 goal :)
> 
> Any comments, naming preferences, "put it in apr-util you twit" flames?
> 
I suspect I'd like to see it in apr-util, but I'd hesitate to call you a
twit :-)
(and change the name accordingly)
Otherwise, looks good.
Cheers,
-Thom

Reply via email to