On Nov 29, 2005, at 10:36 AM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:

On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 10:28:43AM -0500, Jim Jagielski wrote:
I would agree, as long as we remove it for the What's New
pages until it actually works and builds.

My point, obviously, was that we can't have it both ways and
say mod_dbd is great and a new core enhancement if it doesn't
even build under Win32.

Win32 is one platform among many that we support. Additionally, we have very few developers who care to maintain Win32. mod_dbd apparently works just fine on every other platform. Therefore, I don't think removing it from the feature list is warranted. If no one cared about it until now, I
don't care about it either.

If mod_dbd didn't work on Darwin, I wouldn't ask that we remove it from the features list if it works on Linux, Solaris, and Win32. I'd ask that it be noted and move along. I don't know why we would or should grant special
consideration to Win32 here.  -- justin


Either we:

  1. Remove it from the feature list
  2. Keep it in there, but document that it doesn't
     build under Win32
  3. Someone who knows Win32 adds whatever magic is required
     to have it build.

I don't care which one is done, but doing none is just plain
sloppy, and we're better than that (or, at least, we *should* be).

Reply via email to