Jim Jagielski wrote:
On May 17, 2006, at 5:55 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:The Apache Software Foundation and The Apache HTTP Server Project are pleased to announce the release of version 1.3.36 of the Apache HTTP Server ("Apache"). This Announcement notes the significant change in 1.3.36 as compared to 1.3.35. nowhere in here do we we use the word legacy or maintenance or any other discouragement that this isn't actively supported software.because it is not NOT "actively supported software". :)
Are you suggesting that Apache 1.3 is not universally accepted on this list as being at best a maintenance branch? The last release 1.3.35 definately proves that it's barely that, irrespective of who/how the patch was adopted, the candidate was clearly marginally tested - although the *entire* community had an opportunity to test the candidate. Speaking of which - who has a hankering to add Includes wildcard, subdir and <section>nested</section> semantics to the perl-framework suite ;-? That said, I'm looking for your theory before I ask for a vote to clarify.
Agreed that the 1.3 announcement is due for a overhaul.
:) Thank you.
