Jim Jagielski wrote:
What I'm saying is that there is a BIG difference between actively *supported* and actively *developed*. As far as I'm concerned, we still support 1.3.x, for our huge install base of legacy users. Yes, we should encourage people to move up to 2.2.x, but we shouldn't do so by misleading them that we no longer support 1.3.
Doesn't the fact that we are releasing updates demonstrate that there is some level of maintanance? It can be -clearly- designated as legacy, maintanance, or both, without suggesting there is no support. Besides, it's ASF software, it's never been supported ;-) Bill
