On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 11:38:53AM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote: > What I'm saying is that there is a BIG difference between actively > *supported* and actively *developed*. As far as I'm concerned, we > still support 1.3.x, for our huge install base of legacy users.
What does "support" mean in this context? Are we talking about responding to security notices, producing security-related patches and security-related releases? Why would we ever stop doing that as long as someone was willing to write the patch? Just genuinely curious :) -- Colm MacCárthaigh Public Key: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
