On Wednesday 26 July 2006 11:02, Mladen Turk wrote: > There are lots of things to backport. IMHO its the entire HEAD, > and spread over the multiple svn commits. > How we should deal with that? > Having multiple backports or a single one?
IMO if we try and deal with that for a security release this week, we'll botch it. Better to propose backports with a view to 2.2.4. As for number of backports, the ease (or otherwise) of reviewing it is the most important criterion. So perhaps group closely related changes in a single proposal, but split any that are only loosely related. -- Nick Kew
