Re: [VOTE] Apache 2.2.6, 2.0.61 and 1.3.39 release candidate tarballs for review

[William A. Rowe, Jr.]

Jim Jagielski wrote:
> 
> Hmmm... yeah, bummer. If that's it though, I'm +1 on keeping
> as is... we can document this. Or, we could *gasp* just reroll :/

Or we can repack the same files.  This is a packaging artifact, not
an artifact of source control.

Bill