+1:1.3.39 Builds with nothing except for signedness warnings on Win32 (mostly related to goofy FD_SET declarations by MS). So no adverse symptoms.
Jim Jagielski wrote: > > On Sep 4, 2007, at 8:15 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > >> Jim Jagielski wrote: >>> >>> Hmmm... yeah, bummer. If that's it though, I'm +1 on keeping >>> as is... we can document this. Or, we could *gasp* just reroll :/ >> >> Or we can repack the same files. This is a packaging artifact, not >> an artifact of source control. > > repackaged and uploaded. Should sync in a coupla hours. Sigs look great, package contents (adjusted to new path) check out. > I should really spend some cycles and update release.sh for 1.3 :) Considering how often that might be used again (perhaps never?) - knock yourself out. That's the real spirit of scratching our own itches :) Bill
