On 09/05/2007 04:29 PM, Plüm wrote: > >> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- >> Von: Jim Jagielski >> Gesendet: Dienstag, 4. September 2007 23:29 >> An: dev@httpd.apache.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Betreff: [VOTE] Apache 2.2.6, 2.0.61 and 1.3.39 release >> candidate tarballs for review >> >> >> Available for your testing pleasure, 3, count 'em, 3 >> Apache HTTP Server release candidate tarballs, located, >> as expected at: >> >> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ >> >> This vote will run through Sept 6, 2007 and close >> Sept 7, unless otherwise noted... >> >> +/-1 (x == +1) >> >> [ ] apache_1.3.39 >> [ ] httpd-2.0.61 >> [ ] httpd-2.2.6 > > Results for 2.0.61 / 2.2.6: > > md5 / signature ok for .tar.gz / .tar.bz2. > > Solaris 9: > > 5.9 Generic_122300-05 sun4u sparc SUNW,UltraSPARC-IIi-cEngine Solaris > gcc (GCC) 3.3.2 > > No regressions in the perl framework tests that can run on my box compared to > 2.2.4 / 2.0.59. > > 2.0.61: Failed 6/63 test scripts, 90.48% okay. 21/1569 subtests failed, > 98.66% okay. > 2.2.6 : Failed 6/63 test scripts, 90.48% okay. 2/1579 subtests failed, 99.87% > okay. > > Solaris 8: > > 5.8 Generic_117350-46 sun4u sparc SUNW,UltraSPARC-IIi-cEngine Solaris > gcc (GCC) 3.3.2 > > Compiles and starts up fine (did not run the perl framework). > > Linux tests will follow with my votes.
No regression on SuSE Linux 10.2 (32 bit). So +1 from me on 2.2.6 and 2.0.61 Regards Rüdiger
