On 9/6/07, Steffen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The later post was a report of an other tester, sorry no answer I have. > > Yes, I dicusssed it with the maintainer of mod_fcgid today. He is puzzling > now an as I told before, we have to wait. > > Oh, btw: mod_perl (also build with VC8) is not working with 2.2.6, with > 2.2.5 RC no single issue.
Odd works fine with my limited setup over here. I you want to try my binary? Steffen > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "William A. Rowe, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[email protected]> > Sent: Thursday, 06 September, 2007 23:22 > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache 2.2.6, 2.0.61 and 1.3.39 release candidate > tarballs for review > > > > Steffen wrote: > >> > >> I the meantime we have to advise the users not to use 2.2.6 because is > >> not compatible with some mods (not just mod_fcgid). We shall advise to > >> stay on 2.2.4 or 2.2.5 RC. > > > > If you would like to clear up FUD ("some mods") with "explicit mods" > that > > would be productive. It would also be productive to discuss your > concern > > with the mod_fcgid maintainers, as the apr behavior is not likely to be > > regressed to the previous behavior of leaking file handles (which I > > suspect > > mod_fcgid had leveraged). > > > > If I understand your later post; > > > >> mod_fcgid is not working for me, either with Perl or with my own FCGI > >> test program. > > > > your issues with mod_perl were in conjunction -with- mod_fcgid? Just > > trying > > to narrow down the focus. > > > > Bill > > > > -- ~Jorge
