Magnus Bodin wrote: > > A standalone sniffing box should be the best solution to this, I guess. > That does NOT store the content.
Ideally, until you note that if this machine is the SSL endpoint it's the only one with any privilage to put 2+2 together. Both a good and bad thing depending on what you are trying to accomplish. No problem with the patch (I too found %R sort of funky but... what else?) > This is insane. We don't disagree :)
