> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Jim Jagielski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 9. Januar 2008 16:17 > An: dev@httpd.apache.org > Betreff: Re: Pre-release test tarballs of httpd 1.3.40, > 2.0.62 and 2.2.7 available > > > > On Jan 9, 2008, at 9:59 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > > > > On Jan 9, 2008, at 9:42 AM, Nick Kew wrote: > >> Not so sure here - we're not really returning an error status in > >> any case, and sending errors to the backend falls outside the scope > >> of HTTP. > >> > >> I've just voted +1 on keeping that as-is, in the hope of getting > >> backported in time for Jim's 2.2.8 schedule. > > > > Reviewing and testing http://people.apache.org/~niq/ > > chunk_optimization.diff > > as we speak... I'd also like this in 2.2.8... > > > > In the case where we have nothing but zero-length data buckets > in the brigade, we leveraging that when we leave the > loop, we'll be at a sentinel. Even so, any issues with > the small "can't happen" check below? > > /* We had no data in this brigade */ > if (!len || e == APR_BRIGADE_SENTINEL(b)) { > return APR_EAGAIN; > } > >
No. Safety first. Regards Rüdiger
