Just out of curiosity... will 3.0 still be a fresh start or will the core of 2.3 be used?
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 8:31 AM, Roy T. Fielding <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Apr 12, 2008, at 7:10 PM, Paul Querna wrote: > > > For those who were not there, slides from Roy's keynote at ApacheCon EU: > > <http://roy.gbiv.com/talks/200804_Apache3_ApacheCon.pdf> > > > > heh, good thing I managed to get the Internet connection to work long > enough > for the upload. > > > > > The only reply I can really come up with is: > > > > Patches Welcome. > > > > Patches? We don't need no stinkin' patches. > > > > > I don't agree with, or disagree with all of the topics Roy discusses, and > I do think we should focus more on 'fun' things, but I'm not sure we have an > active enough community to really toss everything out, and plunge head first > into a 3.0 development sprint. > > > > We don't have to. The point is that we should stop worrying about what > we have the time to do and just let whoever does have the time to do, > just do, in a way that we can make use of it when we do have the time. > If the result isn't worth adopting, then we don't adopt it as Apache 3. > > We can steer the project wherever the majority want to go, but someone > has to provide the wheels. > > ....Roy > -- ~Jorge
