Brian J. France wrote:

> While Jari's mod_dav_acl is licensed under LGPL, can the patches to
> httpd be licensed that way?
> 
> What would we need to do to get them added if Jari's patches (or even
> mod_dav_acl) would fall under LGPL?

All Jari would need to do is email the list to confirm that he is happy
that these patches can be licensed under the ASF license and included
within httpd, and that's it.

Jari's confirmation would not affect mod_dav_acl in any way, he can
license mod_dav_acl any way he feels comfortable with. It's only the
patches that are imported into httpd - ie these patches you are
submitting - that are affected.

Regards,
Graham
--

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Reply via email to