On Oct 6, 2009, at 1:00 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 3:40 PM, Chris Darroch
<chr...@pearsoncmg.com> wrote:
Jeff Trawick wrote:
Beyond beta, I think we have something that is clearly better
than the 2007 mod_fcgid 2.2 release and should get out the door
soon as a GA (as long as testing doesn't show any regression). I
just made what I hope are uncontroversial changes to the
directive names. I'll try to make peace with the rest. It would
be great if others would decide in the short term what they can't
live with.
The directive name changes look great to me -- thanks very much!
Are there any you remain concerned about?
Earlier I posted suggested changes to just about everything (thread
"[mod_fcgid] Cleaning up configuration directive names"). I've gotten
over that ;) Here are a few from the original list that aren't so
important to change but still might be considered an improvement by
others:
FCGIDOutputBufferSize -> FCGIDResponseBufferSize
FCGIDBusyTimeout -> FCGIDRequestTimeout
FCGIDBusyScanInterval -> FCGIDRequestTimeoutScanInterval (unfortunate
name for unfortunate concept)
Can I make a last-minute plea for readability? Those names suck.
If we just lowercase the cgid, it would be more readable.
FcgidResponseBufferSize
FcgidRequestTimeout
FcgidRequestTimeoutScanInterval
perl -pi -e 's/FCGID/Fcgid/g;' files...
....Roy
