On 15.02.2010 14:40, Jeff Trawick wrote: > On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 8:02 AM, Graham Leggett <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 15 Feb 2010, at 2:11 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote: >> >>> Can somebody besides Graham speak up for why this should be in the >>> httpd distribution and enabled by default? >> >> Can you speak up and explain why it shouldn't? > > AFAICT you're the only one in the world that cares about it (whether > or not that is true; there's been no discussion). > > All I really care is that multiple developers think it is a good idea > to include it in the base distribution. (If not, then I don't think > it should be here.) > > If there's no wider support, I'd participate in exploring another way > for httpd developers to use the ASF infrastructure to store/maintain > modules up until the point where they pick up enough interest among > users or the development community to justify inclusion in the base > and the group maintenance that implies.
+1 We should ensure that there is enough interest and support in new modules before we add them to the base server. Otherwise we should have something like a modules sandbox. Of course we need to take care that it does not become a dumping ground. Regards Rüdiger
