Jeff Trawick wrote:
On that basis, together with the fact that it's small and
documented, I'll give it a +1.
Thanks Nick; that's exactly the kind of feedback I think we should
look for prior to adding yet another module.
Indeed, that's how I read Rüdiger's post I was following up to
and (in case it wasn't clear) agreeing with.
(BTW, I assume your "+1" is for including in trunk vs. "sandbox" or
elsewhere, though that wasn't abundantly clear.)
That was deliberately unclear. I just wanted to express a moderate
level of support-in-principle, and see if anyone else would be
drawn into a discussion of the merits.
But since you ask, I'll give a tentative reply and say trunk.
Unlike some of the other new (post-2.2) modules in trunk,
it's small and simple enough that sandboxing would seem
probably OTT.
--
Nick Kew
