On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 4:33 PM, Nick Kew <[email protected]> wrote: > Ruediger Pluem wrote: > >> We should ensure that there is enough interest and support in new modules >> before we add them to the base server. Otherwise we should have something >> like a modules sandbox. Of course we need to take care that it does not >> become a dumping ground. > > Makes sense. > > I'll stick my hand up and say this module is something I'd have > an interest in: indeed I've hacked similar things for the > testbed before now. Combine it with markup processing modules > from xmlns to xslt/transform, for example, and you have an > interesting family of apps. > > Whether that merits it going in the trunk is another question. > If it does, then surely /filters/ is the wrong place: it's > a generator! > > On that basis, together with the fact that it's small and > documented, I'll give it a +1.
Thanks Nick; that's exactly the kind of feedback I think we should look for prior to adding yet another module. (BTW, I assume your "+1" is for including in trunk vs. "sandbox" or elsewhere, though that wasn't abundantly clear.)
