On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 10:54:27AM -0500, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: > With a release on the way with a host of good bits, almost 2 years after its > previous release, it seems time that the group might consider the following > options... > > [ ] Leave 2.0.x open to maintenance > [ ] Leave 2.0.x open to security/critical bug fixes only > [ ] Retire 2.0.x (but accumulate patches/apply_to_2.0.64) > While the 3rd option seems mighty tempting, that's moving much too fast. How long did it take for 1.3 to change between option 2 and 3? 5 years? Absolutely too long, but jumping 1 to 3 without warning seems a bit harsh to 3rd party module vendors. My suggestion would be to do 2 now and announce the switch to 3 for 12 months from now.
vh Mads Toftum -- http://soulfood.dk
