On 10/18/2010 11:39 AM, Mads Toftum wrote: >> > While the 3rd option seems mighty tempting, that's moving much too fast. > How long did it take for 1.3 to change between option 2 and 3? 5 years?
I think Rich's post about the pain of 1.3 -> 2.x vs 2.0 -> 2.2 summed things up pretty simply, in terms of the reason for waiting a decade to retire 1.3.
