On 18/10/2010 17:54, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: > With a release on the way with a host of good bits, almost 2 years after its > previous release, it seems time that the group might consider the following > options... > > [ ] Leave 2.0.x open to maintenance > [X] Leave 2.0.x open to security/critical bug fixes only > [ ] Retire 2.0.x (but accumulate patches/apply_to_2.0.64)
I can't really state technical reasons, but my gut says to let the public have more than one major revision fully supported at any given point in time. Issac
