Issac Goldstand wrote:
> Am I getting senile, or didn't we vote on making 1.3 End-Of-Life
> already?  If so, why is 1.3.42 still featured on our download page as a
> "current recommended release" a year later?  Isn't it time to change
> that to a note saying something to the extent of "If you absolutely MUST
> continue using 1.3, you can download it from the archive?"

Big +1.


cheers
-- 
Lars Eilebrecht
[email protected]

Reply via email to