On 2/10/2011 9:34 AM, Lars Eilebrecht wrote: > Issac Goldstand wrote: >> Am I getting senile, or didn't we vote on making 1.3 End-Of-Life >> already? If so, why is 1.3.42 still featured on our download page as a >> "current recommended release" a year later? Isn't it time to change >> that to a note saying something to the extent of "If you absolutely MUST >> continue using 1.3, you can download it from the archive?" > > Big +1.
+1 here too - I proposed but the group decided to leave it there for a while. > 1 year is more than a 'while' :)
