On 2/10/2011 12:33 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: > On 2/10/2011 9:34 AM, Lars Eilebrecht wrote: >> Issac Goldstand wrote: >>> Am I getting senile, or didn't we vote on making 1.3 End-Of-Life >>> already? If so, why is 1.3.42 still featured on our download page as a >>> "current recommended release" a year later? Isn't it time to change >>> that to a note saying something to the extent of "If you absolutely MUST >>> continue using 1.3, you can download it from the archive?" >> >> Big +1. > > +1 here too - I proposed but the group decided to leave it there for a while. >> 1 year is more than a 'while' :)
I've seen no objections, and count 3 +1's to remove these, so I'm cleaning this up today.
