We would need to retag and burn a number… fine w/ me.
On Aug 30, 2011, at 9:15 AM, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group wrote: > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Steffen [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2011 2:57 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [VOTE] httpd-2.2.20 tarballs > > All looks fine on Windows +1 > > Download for testing available www.apachelounge.com > > btw. > warning C4244: 'function' : conversion from 'apr_uint64_t' to 'apr_size_t', > possible loss of data byterange_filter.c 213 > > I have fixed this in trunk as r1163197. Anyone opposed to do the same > in 2.2.x? > > Regards > > Rüdiger > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Jim Jagielski" <[email protected]> > Newsgroups: gmane.comp.apache.devel > To: <[email protected]> > Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2011 2:17 AM > Subject: [VOTE] httpd-2.2.20 tarballs > > >> Are available on httpd.apache.org/dev >> >> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ >> >> Vote on release as 2.2.20-GA >> >> >> >
