If we get enough votes by, say, 1:30pm Eastern time (2hrs), I'll retag
and reroll… Otherwise, I'll go ahead w/ releasing 2.2.20.
PS: Power and net are bouncing like jumping beans so I'll check
when I can :)
On Aug 30, 2011, at 11:15 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> We would need to retag and burn a number… fine w/ me.
>
>
> On Aug 30, 2011, at 9:15 AM, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Steffen [mailto:[email protected]]
>> Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2011 2:57 PM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] httpd-2.2.20 tarballs
>>
>> All looks fine on Windows +1
>>
>> Download for testing available www.apachelounge.com
>>
>> btw.
>> warning C4244: 'function' : conversion from 'apr_uint64_t' to 'apr_size_t',
>> possible loss of data byterange_filter.c 213
>>
>> I have fixed this in trunk as r1163197. Anyone opposed to do the same
>> in 2.2.x?
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Rüdiger
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Jim Jagielski" <[email protected]>
>> Newsgroups: gmane.comp.apache.devel
>> To: <[email protected]>
>> Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2011 2:17 AM
>> Subject: [VOTE] httpd-2.2.20 tarballs
>>
>>
>>> Are available on httpd.apache.org/dev
>>>
>>> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
>>>
>>> Vote on release as 2.2.20-GA
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
