All looks good… testing passes w/ no regressions so I'll likely tag and roll tomorrow AM.
On Sep 25, 2011, at 11:38 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > Been a little… preoccupied... Will push this week (and try to > finalize the patch to propose). > > On Sep 25, 2011, at 11:17 AM, Guenter Knauf wrote: > >> Hi all, >> currently the 2.0.65 release seems a bit forgotten ... >> >> 2.0.x STATUS reads: >> 2.0.65 : In maintainance. Jim proposes T&R 9/12-15 and offers to RM. >> >> http://httpd.apache.org/security/CVE-2011-3192.txt mentions: >> ... >> Version 2.0.65 has not been released, but will include this fix, and is >> anticipated in September. >> ... >> >> Jeff has already released APR-0.9.20 at 15-Sep-2011: >> http://www.apache.org/dist/apr/Announcement0.9.html >> >> but we have even not yet commited the 2.0.x byterange fix to 2.0.x-HEAD ... >> >> if we still want to release in September as stated in the security advice >> then we should asap start with the release process, or? >> >> Gün. >> >> >
