On 9/26/2011 11:44 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > On Sep 26, 2011, at 12:20 PM, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group wrote: >> >> I agree with you, but I am leaning towards to revert this behaviour, because >> there >> are too much "stupid" clients out there. So it looks like the "smarter" party >> has to give in :-). Sigh. >> > > Not when the stupid clients are also, from what I can tell, wrong… > > Just because some clients may be/are abusing the spec doesn't mean we need > to support it :)
Hold up... for an arbitrary definition of the word 'wrong'... would you frame your interpretation of what they did incorrectly? There is some distance between ineffective and erroneous.
