On 26.09.2011 17:35, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> All looks good… testing passes w/ no regressions so I'll
> likely tag and roll tomorrow AM.

Is there consensus how to handle the range "0-" returns 200 problem? It
looks like the discussion for 2.2 is still open, but I haven't checked
whether that influences the 2.0 patch.

Regards,

Rainer

Reply via email to