On 02 Feb 2012, at 4:54 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > I'm calling a vote to get consensus on whether we should continue > to bundle apr/apu with httpd 2.4.x. > > The proposal is that at the time we T&R 2.4.x, we also "bundle" > that latest, released versions of apr/apu "with" the httpd tarball. > How we bundle it (eg: sep tarball or have it part of the httpd tarball > ala 2.2.x) and what we call it are *not* part of the vote, the > idea being that if we do wish to bundle it, we can decide the > "best" way to do so. If we don't wish to bundle, the issue is moot. > > Let's give it the normal 72 hours: > > [ ] +1: Bundle apr/apu w/ Apache httpd 2.4.x > [ ] +0: I don't care > [X] -1: Do not bundle apr/apu with Apache httpd 2.4.x
To be most specific, do what we're doing now. (ie separate -deps). APR and APR-Util are standalone projects that are stable and mature, and people should be installing those independently from httpd these days. Regards, Graham --
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
