On Feb 2, 2012, at 10:34 AM, Graham Leggett wrote: > On 02 Feb 2012, at 4:54 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > >> I'm calling a vote to get consensus on whether we should continue >> to bundle apr/apu with httpd 2.4.x. >> >> The proposal is that at the time we T&R 2.4.x, we also "bundle" >> that latest, released versions of apr/apu "with" the httpd tarball. >> How we bundle it (eg: sep tarball or have it part of the httpd tarball >> ala 2.2.x) and what we call it are *not* part of the vote, the >> idea being that if we do wish to bundle it, we can decide the >> "best" way to do so. If we don't wish to bundle, the issue is moot. >> >> Let's give it the normal 72 hours: >> >> [ ] +1: Bundle apr/apu w/ Apache httpd 2.4.x >> [ ] +0: I don't care >> [X] -1: Do not bundle apr/apu with Apache httpd 2.4.x > > To be most specific, do what we're doing now. (ie separate -deps). >
Doing what we're doing now would be: [X] +1: Bundle apr/apu w/ Apache httpd 2.4.x Can you confirm that's how you'd vote?
