On 8/15/2012 8:23 PM, pqf wrote:
> But since someone said remove this sleep(), the server work fine without 
> bottleneck(Maybe
> he didn't notise the warm up issue?), so I thought remove the sleep() is a 
> good idea. But
> reduce the time of sleep() is fine to me too.
> Any other idea?

Can we introduce a blocking call on 'pipe ready' based on the child spawn
being ready to accept data?  The equivalent of a ping-test?

Reply via email to