On 8/15/2012 8:23 PM, pqf wrote: > But since someone said remove this sleep(), the server work fine without > bottleneck(Maybe > he didn't notise the warm up issue?), so I thought remove the sleep() is a > good idea. But > reduce the time of sleep() is fine to me too. > Any other idea?
Can we introduce a blocking call on 'pipe ready' based on the child spawn being ready to accept data? The equivalent of a ping-test?
