On 17.03.2014 20:15, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: > On Mon, 17 Mar 2014 13:25:32 +0100 > Rainer Jung <rainer.j...@kippdata.de> wrote: > >> On 17.03.2014 10:59, Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group wrote: >>> I try to find a slot to vote on 2.2.x later today, but I guess it >>> will be in the evening my local time (GMT+1). >> >> Same here, some builds and tests still running, currently looks OK. >> >> One minor nag: out of tree build found another problem in addition to >> the known one for bundled APR 1.5.0. When building httpd 2.2.27, the >> bundled libtool has version 1.5.26 which does not create the "tools" >> directory before trying to write tools/.libs/gen_test_char.o >> >> httpd 2.4.9 contains libtool 2.4.2, which does not exhibit that >> problem. >> >> So we should also add >> >> $(APR_MKDIR) tools >> >> to the apr Makefile to avoid that pitfall. I'll fix that later in apr >> svn. Basically the breakage of out of tree build for APR 1.5.0 was >> known (r1541744), this is just a new detail. > > Agreed that's the fix, and there has been chatter about putting out > 1.5.1 one of these days. I don't think this is enough to warrant > dumping the release, but I was afraid something odd might happen by > picking up 1.5.0 over 1.4.8. That said - I think 1.5.0 was still the > right call for the time being. > > Anyone doing out of tree builds aught to be able to read the output > of make >build.log 2>&1, and work that out. And most who build out > of tree I expect also build apr, apr-util individually. > > The casual user who would be bit by this bug is undoubtedly grabbing > the tarball and just building the entire stack in-tree, so I'm not > worried to much.
+1 to that. Rainer
