Rainer Jung wrote: > On 17.03.2014 20:15, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: >> On Mon, 17 Mar 2014 13:25:32 +0100 >> Rainer Jung <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> On 17.03.2014 10:59, Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group wrote: >>>> I try to find a slot to vote on 2.2.x later today, but I guess it >>>> will be in the evening my local time (GMT+1). >>> >>> Same here, some builds and tests still running, currently looks OK. >>> >>> One minor nag: out of tree build found another problem in addition to >>> the known one for bundled APR 1.5.0. When building httpd 2.2.27, the >>> bundled libtool has version 1.5.26 which does not create the "tools" >>> directory before trying to write tools/.libs/gen_test_char.o >>> >>> httpd 2.4.9 contains libtool 2.4.2, which does not exhibit that >>> problem. >>> >>> So we should also add >>> >>> $(APR_MKDIR) tools >>> >>> to the apr Makefile to avoid that pitfall. I'll fix that later in apr >>> svn. Basically the breakage of out of tree build for APR 1.5.0 was >>> known (r1541744), this is just a new detail. >> >> Agreed that's the fix, and there has been chatter about putting out >> 1.5.1 one of these days. I don't think this is enough to warrant >> dumping the release, but I was afraid something odd might happen by >> picking up 1.5.0 over 1.4.8. That said - I think 1.5.0 was still the >> right call for the time being. >> >> Anyone doing out of tree builds aught to be able to read the output >> of make >build.log 2>&1, and work that out. And most who build out >> of tree I expect also build apr, apr-util individually. >> >> The casual user who would be bit by this bug is undoubtedly grabbing >> the tarball and just building the entire stack in-tree, so I'm not >> worried to much. > > +1 to that.
+1 Regards Rüdiger
