The reason I didn't use proxy is that we use 'proxy' internally and we now expose that via allowing its use as a handler...
On Jun 11, 2014, at 9:09 AM, Yann Ylavic <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 2:51 PM, Jim Jagielski <[email protected]> wrote: >> So how about 'passthru' as the special scheme? Or >> maybe just 'pass', 'scheme' or even 'glob' ?? > > Simply 'proxy'? Which would not be filenamed to "proxy:proxy:" but to > "proxy:${ap_http_scheme(r)}:"? > Otherwise, +1 for 'passthru'. >
