Oh yes, good point! I prefer 'passthru' then.
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 3:22 PM, Jim Jagielski <[email protected]> wrote: > The reason I didn't use proxy is that we use 'proxy' internally > and we now expose that via allowing its use as a handler... > > On Jun 11, 2014, at 9:09 AM, Yann Ylavic <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 2:51 PM, Jim Jagielski <[email protected]> wrote: >>> So how about 'passthru' as the special scheme? Or >>> maybe just 'pass', 'scheme' or even 'glob' ?? >> >> Simply 'proxy'? Which would not be filenamed to "proxy:proxy:" but to >> "proxy:${ap_http_scheme(r)}:"? >> Otherwise, +1 for 'passthru'. >> >
