Christophe,
do you agree if I modify the 2.4.x proposal with :
Index: STATUS
===================================================================
--- STATUS (revision 1603074)
+++ STATUS (working copy)
@@ -224,12 +224,14 @@
2.4.x patch: trunk works (modulo CHANGES)
+1: ylavic
- * mod_proxy_fdpass: Fix computation of the size of 'struct sockaddr_un'
- when passed to 'connec()'.
- [Graham Dumpleton <grahamd apache org>]
+ * mod_proxy: Don't limit the size of the connectable Unix Domain
Socket paths.
+ [Graham Dumpleton <grahamd apache org>, Christophe Jaillet,
+ Yann Ylavic]
trunk patch: http://svn.apache.org/r1598946
- 2.4.x patch: trunk works (modulo CHANGES)
- +1: jailletc36
+ http://svn.apache.org/r1602989
+ 2.4.x patch:
http://people.apache.org/~ylavic/httpd-2.4.x-ap_proxy_connect_uds.patch
+ (modulo CHANGES/MMN)
+ +1: ylavic
since both commits seem to address the same concern?
Or should I add a new one?
Please note you would have to re-vote.
Regards,
Yann.
