thanks, done in r1603115.
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 11:31 AM, Marion et Christophe JAILLET <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > > > obviously, no problem for me for merging the 2 in the same proposal. > > I'll have a look at it tonight. > > > CJ > >> Message du 17/06/14 10:02 >> De : "Yann Ylavic" >> A : [email protected], "httpd" >> Copie à : >> Objet : Re: svn commit: r1598946 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk: CHANGES >> modules/proxy/mod_proxy_fdpass.c > >> >> Christophe, >> >> do you agree if I modify the 2.4.x proposal with : >> >> Index: STATUS >> =================================================================== >> --- STATUS (revision 1603074) >> +++ STATUS (working copy) >> @@ -224,12 +224,14 @@ >> 2.4.x patch: trunk works (modulo CHANGES) >> +1: ylavic >> >> - * mod_proxy_fdpass: Fix computation of the size of 'struct sockaddr_un' >> - when passed to 'connec()'. >> - [Graham Dumpleton ] > >> + * mod_proxy: Don't limit the size of the connectable Unix Domain >> Socket paths. >> + [Graham Dumpleton , Christophe Jaillet, > >> + Yann Ylavic] >> trunk patch: http://svn.apache.org/r1598946 >> - 2.4.x patch: trunk works (modulo CHANGES) >> - +1: jailletc36 >> + http://svn.apache.org/r1602989 >> + 2.4.x patch: >> http://people.apache.org/~ylavic/httpd-2.4.x-ap_proxy_connect_uds.patch >> + (modulo CHANGES/MMN) >> + +1: ylavic >> >> since both commits seem to address the same concern? >> Or should I add a new one? >> >> Please note you would have to re-vote. >> >> Regards, >> Yann. >>
