Hi,
obviously, no problem for me for merging the 2 in the same proposal. I'll have a look at it tonight. CJ > Message du 17/06/14 10:02 > De : "Yann Ylavic" > A : [email protected], "httpd" > Copie à : > Objet : Re: svn commit: r1598946 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk: CHANGES > modules/proxy/mod_proxy_fdpass.c > > Christophe, > > do you agree if I modify the 2.4.x proposal with : > > Index: STATUS > =================================================================== > --- STATUS (revision 1603074) > +++ STATUS (working copy) > @@ -224,12 +224,14 @@ > 2.4.x patch: trunk works (modulo CHANGES) > +1: ylavic > > - * mod_proxy_fdpass: Fix computation of the size of 'struct sockaddr_un' > - when passed to 'connec()'. > - [Graham Dumpleton ] > + * mod_proxy: Don't limit the size of the connectable Unix Domain > Socket paths. > + [Graham Dumpleton , Christophe Jaillet, > + Yann Ylavic] > trunk patch: http://svn.apache.org/r1598946 > - 2.4.x patch: trunk works (modulo CHANGES) > - +1: jailletc36 > + http://svn.apache.org/r1602989 > + 2.4.x patch: > http://people.apache.org/~ylavic/httpd-2.4.x-ap_proxy_connect_uds.patch > + (modulo CHANGES/MMN) > + +1: ylavic > > since both commits seem to address the same concern? > Or should I add a new one? > > Please note you would have to re-vote. > > Regards, > Yann. >
