On 5/30/2015 9:03 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > So I'll let Eric share what he submitted for May on our behalf, but here > is the submitted/accepted/recorded report of Feb '15 - it's awfully high > level, so I'm not sure that updating dev@ regularly with the contents > offers a whole lot of benefit. Thoughts?
Yeah - The information seems great to share with the community behind httpd, IMO, so I think it would make sense to have on the dev@ list... and it's not like this is a particularly low volume mailing list that such emails would be considered inbox pollution. I guess it's just as easy to pull up the minutes each month by hand, too. -- Daniel Ruggeri
