> Am 24.07.2015 um 15:54 schrieb Ruediger Pluem <rpl...@apache.org>: >>> The c->keepalive = AP_CONN_CLOSE looks fine to me, but why should we do the >>> other stuff in a handler. >>> IMHO that should be done by the existing code. >> >> Not sure I understand. You mean the interim response or the whole handler? > > No I mean the > > ap_lingering_close(c); > > and the scoreboard update.
You are probably correct that the existing code already handles that and it should go. I will not find the time to do this and test all again before my vacation. Either it waits or someone else takes a stab at it... Cheers, Stefan <green/>bytes GmbH Hafenweg 16, 48155 Münster, Germany Phone: +49 251 2807760. Amtsgericht Münster: HRB5782
