But would it have an "Upgrade: + Connection:" header? I might be wrong, but I thought mod_proxy_wstunnel adds those headers before sending the request to a backend. So the core_ugprade_handler would not see those.
> Am 02.09.2015 um 16:04 schrieb Eric Covener <cove...@gmail.com>: > > On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 10:01 AM, Stefan Eissing > <stefan.eiss...@greenbytes.de> wrote: >> Hmm. Is the >> ap_hook_handler(core_upgrade_handler,NULL,NULL,APR_HOOK_REALLY_FIRST); >> called for requests that mod_proxy_wstunnel makes against a backend? > > yes, the guts of mod_proxy is just a handler, so this would run before that. <green/>bytes GmbH Hafenweg 16, 48155 Münster, Germany Phone: +49 251 2807760. Amtsgericht Münster: HRB5782