But would it have an "Upgrade: + Connection:" header? I might be wrong, but I 
thought mod_proxy_wstunnel adds those headers before sending the request to a 
backend. So the core_ugprade_handler would not see those.

> Am 02.09.2015 um 16:04 schrieb Eric Covener <cove...@gmail.com>:
> 
> On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 10:01 AM, Stefan Eissing
> <stefan.eiss...@greenbytes.de> wrote:
>> Hmm. Is the
>>  ap_hook_handler(core_upgrade_handler,NULL,NULL,APR_HOOK_REALLY_FIRST);
>> called for requests that mod_proxy_wstunnel makes against a backend?
> 
> yes, the guts of mod_proxy is just a handler, so this would run before that.

<green/>bytes GmbH
Hafenweg 16, 48155 Münster, Germany
Phone: +49 251 2807760. Amtsgericht Münster: HRB5782



Reply via email to