Am 01.07.2016 um 15:23 schrieb Yann Ylavic:
On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 3:17 PM, Yann Ylavic <ylavic....@gmail.com> wrote:On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 3:02 PM, Reindl Harald <h.rei...@thelounge.net> wrote:Am 01.07.2016 um 14:41 schrieb Yann Ylavic:The -I does not take any argument, it tells ab to use iether the -H "Host: ..." if any, or the host from the given URL otherwisebut why is there a param needed instead just send the SNI header from the given URL like any browser does?You may want to use an IP (or another DNS name) in the URL and still reach the right (Virtual)Host on the server by specifying a -H "Host: ...". The -H "Host:" existed already, and if it's used it has to be taken for the SNI, that's how the server will elect the appropriate VirtualHost if multiple ones listen on the same port.Oh, I probably misunderstood your remark, you probably meant this should be the defaut when TLS is available and used (per -f). Good point, will look at it
exactly - it's all present what is needed to send the host-header and in case of TLS that's just the same which is needed for the SNI header without the need to tell "ab" it should use SNI by introducing a new param
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
