On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 4:05 PM, William A Rowe Jr <wr...@rowe-clan.net> wrote: > Yup, no extra steps for correct behavior. > > I'd support a ''surpress SNI' flag, and/or an explicit SNI arg, much like > openssl s_client -- just for testing. But that should be the exceptional > case.
Done, so that one can also test renegotiations when no SNI is given but multiple vhosts listening on the same port don't use the same SSL parameters. Full patch (vs latest 2.4.x) at http://home.apache.org/~ylavic/patches/httpd-2.4.x-ab_sni.patch. Thanks everyone for the feedbacks.
